Saturday, November 18, 2006

Torture Victim Admits to Forced Confession, Al Qaida Tricked US into Iraq War



Al Qaida Tricked US into War with Iraq

sycophantic neocon apologist: "See, them Al Qaider is crafty! Theys tricked are Good Christun president Dubya Bush!!!"

Let me get this straight..

According to the article, a single, tortured man, upon being prodded specifically about whether Iraq had a role in al Qaida operations, said something to the affect of: 'We were receiving recruits from Iraq.'

Then, in between water-boarding sessions or worse and upon being prodded specifically about which Muslim nation we should invade first to rid the world of the super al Qaida juggernaut, he said 'Iraq.'

Nevermind the entire body of data collected through various forms of intelligence operations worth tens of billions of dollars annually. We invaded Iraq because [*deep breath*] US foreign policy proxy Pakistan's ISI instituted Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan was training Iraqis how to wield box-cutters, according to one man.

Why don't you just argue that because the super Islamo-fascist al Qaida war-machine took in US citizen John Walker Lindh, that the entire US government should be violently overthrown and hundreds of thousands, if not millions of our citizens killed?

That would be ridiculous, right?

Well not in 21st century America's world of disgraceful, Rockefeller educated citizenry who know more about pop-culture than they do the rights their forefathers screamed, fought, bled and died slowly and agonizingly for.

In 21st century America, the president's inncer circle (Gonzalez, Hu) of (il)legal consultants decide what is law. Then the anthrax threatened congress and supreme court shills agree, lest they find themselves the target of a smear campaign by the government's CFR owners' media influence, or worse.

After all, a US judge has already awarded $104 million dollars to 9/11 victims' families on the basis of admittedly "meager evidence" of material support to al Qaida by Iraq's former Baathist government, lead by lifelong CIA asset Saddam Hussein.

U.S. District Judge Harold Baer said lawyers relied heavily on "classically hearsay" evidence, including reports that a Sept. 11 hijacker met an Iraqi consul to Prague, Secretary of State Colin Powell's remarks to the United Nations about connections between Iraq and terrorism, and defectors' descriptions of the use of an Iraq camp to train terrorists.

Stop the presses! According to hearsay, a 9/11 hijacker met with an Iraqi consul to Prague, Iraq has connections to terrorism and an Iraqi camp was used to train terrorists!

If we're going to hold government's responsible for meeting with terrorists, why don't we prosecute them for living with terrorists or employing them directly (1, 2, 3, 4)?

If we're going to hold a government responsible for their history of terrorism not related to the case at hand, why don't we hold all of them responsible for the same?

If we're going to prosecute a government for training terrorists on their own military bases, why don't we prosecute all of them?

Face it. The allegation that al Qaida tricked the US into war with Iraq is horse-shit propaganda.

Now let's cut out the sycophantic defense of treachery in the US federal bureacracy and discuss why intelligence reports really showed Iraq had WMDs.

Thursday, November 02, 2006

The US Became a Full-Blown Fascist Police State to Little Fanfare



www.newworldslaughter.blogspot.com | November 3, 2006

Certainly we're not yet a full-blown dictatorship (empahsis on full-blown), much less a one party fascistic dictatorship but it does appear as of late, that the current presidential administration is claiming the right to exercise power on an unprecedented scale and lobbying for more consolidation of power under their branch by the day. At what point will it stop?

The feds have networked with private interests for some time. It's really nothing new. In more recent times, the White House was given shit about their no-bid contracts to Halliburton. Unconditional supporters of the current administration called it harmless crony-capitalism at the worst, corrupt but nothing new. After all, people in government have been screwing the tax-payers for their own benefit for decades.

While it's wrong, the American people are lax to do anything about it because democracy - the preferred method - would only ensure that another crony-capitalist administration take the place of the one they remove. That seems to be the consensus; that politicians are criminals so if their forebearers got away with something, it will most likely be policy in their administration.

Another recent example are the Blackwater Security Mercenaries the feds' have hired to combat the insurgency in Iraq. Admittedly, I haven't done a whole lot of research on this one. I would be interested to find out if they're held to the same standards as US troops are. I have heard that their US tax-payer funded salaries are significantly higher than that of their government counterparts, conventional soldiers. Perhaps though, it's necessary, people think, lest we become millitarily over-extended in the face of such threats as North Korea and Iran, countries our government actually facilitated the nuclear programs of, unbeknowest to most people.

Is your trust for the current administration or any future administration that may inhabit 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue such that you're not worried about the level of opression that could conceivably befall you if they every employ the methods I've so far described domestically?

Well there's more.

Google has had light shed on them before by privacy advocates. If I'm not mistaken, their G-Mail scans your mail, supposedly for spam and their search engine remembers virtually everything that has ever been sought from your IP. Most recently, ex-CIA analyst Robert Steele has claimed that Google is in bed with the feds. If you're not doing anything wrong though, it shouldn't matter, right? I mean governments and criminality are so at odds with each other and criminals have never claimed license or legitamacy for their actions. Nevermind the widely accepted notion that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Anybody with 2 brain cells to rub together knows that president Bush is doing an excellent job looking out for our interests, yet 2/3 of American's don't think so. So much for the majority.

Here is the kicker though. Amid ever increasing claims of police powers, Target(TM) is now stepping up to the plate, assuming your ass is the plate.




Target Corporation Will Provide 1 T-Shirt for Every American. You will be expected to wear it when their federal counterparts tell you. That's a joke but how many of you believed it and how many of you think it's not that far-fetched? How many of were trying to rationalize it, thinking the red and blue is patriotic anyway and that Target is providing a security measure against Islamofascism so to not wear the shirt would be treacherous?

Benito Mussolini said the following: "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."

Is Target not the quintessential corporation and is America not a state?

Retailer Target Branches Out Into Police Work

Now it's one thing when the state is using corporations to feed US troops in foreign combat zones. It's another thing entirely when large retailers are vying for the license to surveil, regulate and control you. IBM in fact, tattooed the Jews in nazi Germany and IG Farben made the Zyklon B to gas them. What lies in your future?

Let's assume for a minute that the threat of Islamic extremism is not only real but to the extent and manner it is portrayed. Fine, but will our approach to countering it not lead to the eventual destruction of our republic and provided we somehow effectively counter this threat of Islamic extremism before that can happen, will the concerted network of control, least among them the lobbyists, ever give up the surface area of democracy they have encroached upon?

It's been said before that a service based economy is a hall-mark of any third-world nation. Are we not transitioning from a goods based economy to a service based economy?

Think about it. You become a powerful nation when other countries want to purchase your goods. You have leverage and influence.

However, when tax-payer money is getting an incredibly lopsided allocation for enforcement of social order domestically, pardon my analogy, but you're essentially eating your own limbs, defacating and eating your own shit, over and over. It's just not healthy. You're not producing anything as a society, just degenerating.

If you're not disturbed by this, you are not American. You have no survival instinct to speak of. You've either had it bred out of you through decades of domestication or are under severe mind-control, television propaganda.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

So You Still Think the WMD Intelligence Was a Mistake? Sit Down..



The Office of Special Plans wasn't the first pentagon chop shop neocon agent Donald Rumsfeld set up to cherry-pick CIA intelligence.

You're probably well aware that he set up the OSP in 2002 so the neocons could get their hands on the CIA intel with respect to Iraq. It's been said by critics and ex-officials who were separated from the yes-men and purged in the wake of the invasion, that the neocon hierarchy arrived at their conclusion first and then built a case around it, the notion that Iraq had WMDs.

Look what Rumsfeld had to say in 1975 with respect to the Soviets..

"The Soviet Union has been busy. They've been busy in terms of level of their effort. They've been busy in terms of the actual weapons that they've been producing. They've been busy in terms of expanding production rates. They've been busy in terms of expanding their institutional capability to produce additional weapons at additional rates. They've been busy in terms of expanding their capability to increasingly improve the sophistication of those weapons. Year after year after year, they've been demonstrating they have steadiness of purpose, that they're purposeful about what they're doing. Now the question is what 'aught one to be doing about that?"

The CIA and other agencies who watched the Soviet Union continuously for any sign of threat, said this was a complete fiction. There was no truth to Rumsfeld's allegations.

Rumsfeld then lobbied president Ford to set up an independent inquiry, a so-called "2nd opinion" on the matter. The war pretext chop-shop was born. Same man, same position, same cherry-picking from the same agency, same building, that would be used 25 years later for the same brand of deception. Hell, I wonder if it was in the same wing of the Pentagon. In 1976, They called their chop-shop project "Team B".

They did alot more than fear-monger over phantom menaces though. To hear and see the neocon fringe in all their glory, trying to push us on the precepice of world war with the Soviets in the 70s, start this video at minute 25 and sit tight. Any rational human being should be awe-struck at the insanity of it.

Luckily for the world, Operation Northwoods never became a reality and the neocons didn't have the perceived license to throw their weight around without having sustained the "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" they claimed in 2000 they needed as a license to roll out the "multiple theater wars" we have since found ourselves waging in the wake of 9/11.

In the very same PNAC document where the Pearl Harbor reference was made in September of 2000, a year before 9/11 and prior to Bush seizing office and appointing Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense, are the following signatories:

Donald Rumsfeld 1976 - Defense Secretary in Ford Administration, set up "Team B" to cherry-pick CIA intel

Donald Rumsfeld 2002 - Defense Secretary in Bush Administration, set up "Office of Special Plans" to cherry-pick CIA intel



Dick Cheney 1976 - Joint Cheifs of Staff in Ford Administration

Dick Cheney 2002 - Vice-President in Bush Administration



Paul Wolfowitz 1976 - Director of Policy Planning at Defense Department in Ford Administration, sat on "Team B Committee"

Paul Wolfowitz 2002 - Deputy Director of Defense in Bush Administration, oversaw PNAC agent Douglas Feith's OSP results with colleague Rumsfeld



Jeb Bush - not applicable

William Krystol - not applicable



In Bush's 2002 state of the Union address, we were told that Iraq could strike the Western Hemisphere with nuclear weapons in as little as 45 minutes. That must have been the crock of bullshit they cobbled together in the Office of Special Plans. Do you want to know which manner of shit they squeezed out in "Team B", roughly 30 years ago?

They actually came to the conclusion that the absence of evidence the CIA had demonstrating the Soviets were in possession of an acoustic missile defense system on their nuclear submarine fleet didn't mean the Soviets didn't have one, but rather that it was so advanced, we couldn't detect it.

THAT was the evidence Rumsfeld expected you to think warranted a response to the Phantom Menace across the ocean at that time.

Luckily, according to CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the men who would later become the PNAC front-men were regarded at the time by those in the White House as "the crazies". The people in power at the time, let them have their pet project in the Pentagon but stood on the side of reason and dismissed their wild-eyed conspiracy theories.

Unfortunately, president Bush is a marionette for "the crazies" and has no plans to deviate from that. In fact, they've set up another intelligence chop-shop in the pentagon as recently as 2006.

It's called the "Iranian Directorate".

Russian President Putin Seized Power Just Like Bush & Hitler





The nazis and the neocons weren't the only political parties that seized power as a result of terrorist attacks perpetraited by their own intelligence services.



On September 22nd 1999, Vladimir Putin's FSB (Federal Security Bureau) officials were caught planting hexagene explosives in an apartment building in Ryazan Russia. They were the same manner of explosives alleged to have been used by Chechen rebels in a wave of bombings prior to that day, ravaging Russia in the month of September.



Upon being caught in Ryazan, Russia's FSB claimed that it was not a bombing plot but rather a drill, which would later lend credence to notions that the MI5 and MI6 agents (Aswat, Kahn) involved in the 7/7 London bombings that took place in conjunction with exercises at the same place and time as the actual attacks, were not "double agents" as we were told but in fact part of a compartmentalized plot within the British government. The local police in Ryazan Russia who caught the FSB officials were rewarded with color screen TVs for their vigilance and the wave of bombings inexplicably stopped.









4,400 Copies of a book by former FSB official Alexander Litvinenko alleging that in the very least, the FSB was involved in the bombings on 9/13/99 and 9/9/99 were seized by the state as "Enemy Propaganda".













Russian Media Tycoon Boris Berezovsky's documentary film "Assassination of Russia", followed by Andrei Nekrasov's film "Disbelief", would later advance the same notion as FSB agent Alexander Litvinenko, that the bombings were a product of a Russian arm of the military industrial complex, not merely or at all, a product of Chechen rebels.



Read more about the 1999 apartment bombings in Russia here.

Friday, September 15, 2006

The Nazis were Warlocks. Are we Led by Warlocks Today?


9/11 has been called many things. I've heard it called a tragedy or a wake-up call and by people in the establishment and those who support it's course of action since then, an opportunity.

There have been allegation since 9/11 that the events were intentionally allowed to occur by certain individuals in power, that they thwarted procedures that would've prevented it and may have at some level been involved in the destruction of the twin towers and building 7 through covert means, bombs planted in advance.

Most average people couldn't conceive of using power and connections in political, bureaucratic and private enterprise to murder innocent others simply for greed and advancement of power, an excuse to build apparatuses that they themselves would rule over and benefit from, even after retiring from one area of the establishment, for instance getting a job on the board of directors for a major defense, oil or pharamceutical company as so many ex politicians do.

However, what if there were people who not only didn't worry about repurcussions in the afterlife but were convinced that ruling by force and coercion were the only way to seize and maintain power in a world of sin, believing that man is nothing more than a complex animal that needs fear and hope to keep him in check. "After all", they could tell themselves, "If we don't slaughter a few of them with surgical precision (9/11) and consequently use that fear (Al Qaida) to build a benevolent empire, other parties (Russia/China/Iran) who will not be so forgiving might seize the globe, those more in line with the dictators of the 20th century, Stalin and Mao and Hitler.

Nevermind that the US government is responsible for the establishment of Al Qaida and very obviously funds their operations through their Pakistani intelligence proxy (ISI). Nevermind that they established the current form of Iranian government after ousting a democratically elected, secular government. Nevermind the disturbing connections between the US and Iran - countries which are not friendly in front of the TV cameras - in the last few decades or even the fact that companies connected to Dick Cheney provided nuclear components to Iran, even so recently as 2005.

Could many wars be the product of covert cooperation between parties on both sides to stimulate economies, get rid of exploding population growth and maintain the current hierarchy of control that world power brokers maintain? That is a question that has been proposed by many academics and scholars over the centuries for you to ponder as we stand on the precipice of World War 3 but the purpose of this thread is to draw attention to a phenomenon whicih I feel is more obvious, though only if you read between the lines.

9/11/41 - The US Government ceremonially broke ground to build the Pentagon.

9/11/73 - The CIA was involved in the assassination of Chilean president Salvador Allende.

9/11/94 - Frank Eugene Corder stole a single engine cessna aircraft from an airfield in Baltimore on the evening of 9/11, yet wasn't able to crash it into the White House until after midnight, early on the morning of 9/12/94.

9/11/87 - declared "9-1-1 Emergency Number Day" by US president Ronald Reagan.

9/11/90 - US president George Herbert Walker Bush outlines the plan for a "New World Order" in his State of the Union Address and threatens military action against Iraq for their invasion of Kuwait even though Iraq had previously sought consultancy on their border dispute and was told by US Ambassador April Gillespie that they Group of pilots disputes question official version of 9/11had no opinion on the matter. Secretary of State James Baker told her to "emphasize this instruction".

9/11/01 - The infamous attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

9/11/02 - New York Pick 3 Lottery is 9-1-1 on 1 year anniversary. Chicago Mercantile Exchange's S&P futures closed at 911.00.

9/11/05 - Israel officially declares an end to their 38 year occupation of Gaza.

11/9/05 - (9/11 inverse) Hotel Bombings in Amman, Jordan. Iraqi woman allegedly involved was previously in US custody in Iraq.

1/19/06 - (9/11 inverse) Bombing in Tel Aviv Israel, Israel blames Iran. CIA releases first Bin Laden tape in years.

3/11/04 -Al Qaida, allegedly with the help of the Spanish Security Services - planted 13 bombs in Madrid Spain. Only 10 were detonated. There are 911 days between 9/11/01 and 3/11/04. Then on 11/30/05 (3/11 inverse), the Pentagon staged "Operation Iron Hammer" West of Baghdad using the 13th Expeditionary Marine Unit.

Yes, Operation Iron Hammer was named after an Operation staged by the nazis in World War 2 and yes, the nazis too organized their military campaigns according to occultism since like terrorism, it is blood sacrifice. I have dozens of more examples of this phenomenon of militant operations being carried out or declared on 9/11 or some form of it's inverse, either 1/19 or 11/9.

Before you allow these facts to trigger establishment seeded ideas - mostly from cartoons and movies - you have about the absurdity of blood sacrfice and the trappings that go with it, consider the fact that 9/11 - whether or not we know the truth about that day - has set into motion a chain of events that a true warlock could not be more proud of. Let us have a look at some of the definitions for occult related words..

WARLOCK:

1 : a man practicing the black arts (psychological warfare, black-operations): SORCERER -- compare WITCH
2 : CONJURER


SORCERY:

1 : the use of power gained from the assistance or control of evil spirits (black-operatives, Al Qaida among them) especially for divining : NECROMANCY
2 : MAGIC


WITCHCRAFT:

1 a : the use of sorcery or magic (9/11) b : communication with the devil or with a familiar
2 : an irresistible influence or fascination
3 : WICCA


WICCA:

: a religion influenced by pre-Christian beliefs and practices of western Europe that affirms the existence of supernatural power (as magic) and of both male and female deities (Osiris and Isis, both prevalent in architecture in DC, London & Jerusalem among others) who inhere in nature and that emphasizes ritual observance of seasonal and life cycles


NECROMANCY:

1 : conjuration of the spirits of the dead (constant evocation of "Pearl Harbor") for purposes of magically revealing the future or influencing the course of events (PNAC world takeover)
2 : MAGIC, SORCERY


MAGIC:

1 a : the use of means - as charms or spells - believed to have supernatural power over natural forces b : magic rites or incantations
2 a : an extraordinary power or influence seemingly from a supernatural source (fear, anger) b : something that seems to cast a spell : ENCHANTMENT
3 : the art of producing illusions by sleight of hand (pyschological warfare with regard to 9/11: disinformation and absence of entire picture)


Just as the definition of Wicca describes it as the worship of male and female gods, so too was there a belief in male and female gods as far back as ancient Babylon, the very cradle of civilization.

Though it is often associated only with the worship of the sun, the obelisks in ancient Egypt have been proven conclusively to be a representation of the male phallus, the penis of the god Osiris. It was a symbol of virility. Solomon's temple is essentially a phallus when you look at it's design. Archways into the buildings of many ancient structures represented the clitoral hood of the female sexual organ.

The prude society much of the world has grown to become, especially the US, dictates that it's citizens shun these facts out of embarassment, assuming that because with their own moral compass they couldn't have conceived, much less manifested these ideas, that no others would dare.

Not only is there a pyramid on the back of the US dollar, the exact same one sits atop the Israeli Supreme Court building in Jerusalem. There are obelisks in Washington DC, London, Paris and many other cities throughout the world, especially those in Egypt dating back thousands of years.

The pentagon is the center of the pentagram for a reason and they built it on 9/11 for a reason. Though there could be arguements that Al Qaida would want to destroy the pentagon on the anniversary of it's ground-breaking as well as the giant 11 - the trade center in New York - to spite the West, it cannot explain why the West would use the same date to explain it's own methodical use of the date for similar operations.

Neither can it explain the following: Take the 11th and 22nd day of each month. Then take each day of the year for which the month/day relationship are the same number. For instance, 1/1, 2/2, 3/3, 4/4, 5/5. Those dualistic numbers only comprise roughly 10% of the days on a 365 day calendar. Not only does Al Qaida use strictly those numbers for terrorist attacks, they must have orchestrated the Kennedy assassination (11/22), the MLK assassination (4/4) and the day Reagan was shot (3/30). Nobody with more than 2 brain cells to rub together could look at all of the hard evidence and these mysterious patterns I've provided and declare that it is ALL coincidence.

The sad fact of the matter is, the upper echelon of Al Qaida is run by the same interests that run the US government and many governments throughout the world. They are military-industrial-pharmaceutical interests that want to establish a utopian world government, something that many believe - myself included - will be no utopia for the average person but rather a living hell since it is established that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, causing indifference to suffering at best and proactive harm of others and joy in the material rewards for doing so.

Warriors in cultures of times past were known to wear the bones of their victims as a form of psychological warfare. Pirate ships were adorned with them or a flag depicting them (Jolly Roger) as a warning to the enemy. The Schythians drank blood from fresh corpses on the battlefield and sometimes kept a victim's skull and later used it as a cup to drink from.




So why is the US government using some of the blood sacrificed steel in the World Trade Center to build a battleship?

Why did the London bombers detonate their bombs right in front of the Tavistock Institute entrance on 7/7? How could they know that bus number 30 would be detoured by the local police - acting on orders from the feds - to that location?

The United Nations' Manhattan Headquarters was allegedly built on the blood soaked land of a former slaughterhouse. Though I can't confirm this at the moment, I did recall hearing that a UN official made a statement some years ago, claiming that the land was holy because of this.

If you would like to see more of the bizarre occult antics of the global elite, click here.

Monday, September 04, 2006

Israeli Newspapers Expose CIA Boogeyman as Sayanim Agent

Israeli Newspapers Expose CIA Boogeyman as Sayanim Agent for Mossad



Victor Ostrovksy was a Canadian-born, Israeli raised Jew. He was an agent for mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence gathering agency which like it's US counterpart the CIA, is involved more in covert action and likewise is a documented terrorist organization which engages in false-flag terrorist attacks on it's own citizens as well as it's so-called allies. The UK's MI5 and MI6 as well as the CIA's sister organziation in Southeast Asia, their proxy outfit Pakistani ISI, share this label as well.

If I were describing any agency but mossad, I would not have given such a long disclaimer but lest I be absurdly accused of anti-semitism, a stigma associated with anyone who dare say citizens within Israeli borders are capable of committing fraud and murder like those within the confines of any other man-made border on this planet, I felt it necessary.



Moving forward, Ostrovky wrote a tell-all book titled "By Way of Deception" which was a New York Times Best Seller. In it, Ostrovsky explained mossad's lawless terrorist methods and their real-world applications. Mossad, an agency which has orchestrated bombings on US interests abroad, disgusing them as Islamic operations, sought a ban on Ostrovsky's book to no avail and certain agents publicly stated that a good Canadian Jew would murder Ostrovsky.

In his book, Ostrovsky described a Mossad Sayanim agent in the following way:

"The next day, Ran S delivered a lecture on the Sayanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad's operation. Sayanim - assistants - must be 100 percent Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not Israeli citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel. An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to write a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?

There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2,000 who are active, and another 5,000 on the list. They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on. The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only costs."


Now read the following arcticle, notice the links, research the information and tell me that Adam Yahiye Gadhan is not a Sayanim agent. At any rate, the CIA knows this and is using him just the same. A popular misconception, is that intelligence agencies only operate among themselves when in fact, they collude with terrorist organizations, the mafia, etc. and this is documented history. I've demonstrated it in my latest blog post if you care to find out. Now, on to the article about Gadahn.



New Al Qaeda Video More CIA Black Op Propaganda
Pathetic pretence kept up that "Al Qaeda" is still or ever was a real organized terror outfit and not the creation of deep intelligence.

Steve Watson / Infowars | September 4 2006

The latest cobbled together trash home video to be released and accredited to "Al Qaeda" is yet another piece of scripted propaganda that portrays a desperate attempt to give the impression that the group operates as a cohesive unit.

It is becoming tiresome to have to address these endless videos which are released whenever the Administration is feeling the pressure, something that now seems to be a permanent feature of this government.

As Kurt Nimmo so eloquently puts it, this time the tape features Azzam the American, aka Adam Yahiye Gadahn, born Adam Pearlman, and also going by the names Abu Suhayb al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, and Yihya Majadin Adams (a score card is required to keep track).

Californian Adam Gadahn, wearing a white robe and turban, introduces the message by calling on Westerners to convert, reports CNN. We invite all Americans and believers to Islam, whatever their role and status in Bush and Blairs world order, Gahahn declares. Decide today, because today could be your last day.

Oh the drama. FEEEEL the force of the Dark Side, you know you want to give in to it, come over to us while you still have a chance.

Gadahn is the perfect turncoat, the proof positive that we are engaged in a global turf war with the terrorists for hearts and minds.

Gadahn, who disappeared from California seven years ago, first appeared unmasked on an al Qaeda tape made public in July of this year. His past is however very sketchy and more than a little suspicious. Could he be an invention of Western intelligence?



Adam Gadahn is in fact the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl Pearlman was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993. This information today also appeared in the Jerusalem post.

The Washington Post has previously reported that While living with his grandparents in suburban Santa Ana, he made his first trip to the nearby mosque in 1995. He introduced himself as Yahya - the Arabic name for John the Baptist, revered as a great prophet in Islam.

So what is the grandson of a prominent Jew who lives with his grandfather doing attending a mosque? Furthermore given this context it seems suspicious that he would then assault members of the Mosque and turn to radical Islam, which is what he then did just before disappearing off to Pakistan.

Gadahn / Azzam/ Pearlman is also known for an internet essay Becoming Muslim, which, as Los Angeles City Beat Journalist Annette Stark has pointed out, is itself very suspicious:

On the left, conspiracy theorists no less energized than their right-wing counterparts got busy, too. They thought it strange, they said, as if the government stitched the story together from scratch. Some kid who never before posted to the Internet drops a deeply personal revelation onto a USC website, a diatribe that is chock full of anti-government, anti-Christian sentiments, and then pretty much disappears from cyberspace."

It is basically written from a Zionist perspective and not the perspective of the American government in 1995. Remember there was no war on "Islamic Fascism" in 1995.



Another key indicator that Gadahn / Azzam/ Pearlman is in the employ of Western Intelligence comes from a report out of the Orange County Weekly which details how a man named Khalil Deek, a computer expert who attended the same Mosque as Gadahn and later became a "top Al Qaeda deputy", was continually protected by US authorities and allowed to go free on several occasions. Khalil Deek and Adam Gadahn were accused of organizing a terrorist cell in Anaheim in the mid to late nineties.

In the past we have highlighted numerous cases of intrinsic links between the major intelligence agencies and Al Qaeda operatives. Quite a few of these have happened to be Jewish or MOSSAD operatives.

In December 2002 the Executive Intelligence review reported that:

"the Israeli Mossad and other Israeli intelligence services have been involved in a 13-month effort to "recruit" an Israeli-run, phony "al-Qaeda cell" among Palestinians, so that Israel could achieve a frontline position in the U.S. war against terrorism and get a green light for a worldwide "revenge without borders" policy.'

The Sydney Morning Herald also reported :

"The Palestinian Authority arrested a group of collaborators who confessed they were working for Israel, posing as al-Qaeda operatives in the Palestinian territories," said the official, on condition of anonymity."

The AP also reported the operation:

"Early last week, Rashi Abu Sba, head of the preventive security apparatus in Gaza, the equivalent of the Shin Bet, accused the Israeli security service of tricking young Palestinians into conducting missions in the name of Al-Qaida."

MOSSAD has been caught on many occasions infiltrating radical groups to further their own agendas.

There are also many examples of other intelligence agencies using Al Qaeda as a front for their activities.

Al Qaeda, formerly a Mujahideen database, began as a CIA-ISI contrivance, with likely more than a little help not only from Mossad, but German intelligence (BND) and NATO, the latter two teaming up during the so-called Kosovo War (see German Intelligence and the CIA supported Al Qaeda sponsored Terrorists in Yugoslavia).

Terror expert John Loftus has previously confirmed this "...back in the late 1990s, the leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That's when Al-Muhajiroun got started."

We have previously revealed how former MI5 officer David Shayler has alleged, and French intel sources have corroborated, that the MI6 paid a Libyan Al Qaeda cell £100,000 in 1995 to assassinate colonel Qaddafi. The use of the group that has come to be known as "Al Qaeda" as assets by Intelligence services the world over is well documented.

The London Independent also reported 2 days before the London Bombings how MI5 has previously used so called Al Qaeda operatives as informants, allowing them to be left alone as a trade off.

This only came to light when Bisher al-Rawi was captured by the CIA and taken to the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay. The original Independent link has now mysteriously been removed.

John Loftus also spelt out on FOX TV that British Intelligence and the US dept of Justice had protected Haroon Rashid Aswat, the originally cited mastermind of the 7/7 bombings: "Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon... we've just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat... , apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence"

Furthermore, before he was laid out to pasture earlier this year, presumably because it was getting ridiculous the amount of times he had already been reported captured or killed, Musab Al-Zarqawi's role was exaggerated by The Pentagon in order to subtly link Iraq and 9/11 and quell criticism of the war.



Leaked documents even admitted that the Pentagon had concocted fake Al-Zarqawi letters boasting about suicide attacks and leaked them to the New York Times. The same documents directly stated that the false promotion of Al-Zarqawi included marking the the "U.S. Home Audience" as one of the targets of a broader propaganda campaign."

This information is startling and again highlights how Al Qaeda exists as an organized body only where the intelligence services have created, funded and employed it.

What purpose does Azzam the American serve?

Of course the new evil is the Homegrown terrorist. As the recent plots in Britain and before them the London bombings have proven, Al Qaeda is now an ideology. This latest piece of scripted propaganda directly supports that notion. So it works on different levels to reinforce everything that the government is saying about the war on terror, that it is expanding and it is global, being fought on home and foreign soil.

The latest video also comes on the same day as the announcement that the number 2 of "Al Qaeda in Iraq" has been captured, whoever that is.

This latest video again features Ayman al-Zawahiri, the Al Qaeda number 2 - where's the number 1 again?

As we have exhaustedly documented, it is becoming increasingly difficult to use new material of Bin Laden because he has been dead for at least 4 years. Much like the cult sixties TV show The Prisoner, it is clear that number one doesn't actually exist and the power behind this phantom menace will never actually reveal its face.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

An Assortment of Crazy Shit to Make you Go Hmmmm!

I'm sick of posting 300 links to back up my assertions. Virtually everything I'm going to say in the following thread is 100% verifiable so just look it up if you doubt me.

I was recently made aware that Iran was hosting a military operation titled "Operation Prophet" which references Islam. I figured that since the title references religion, it would not be long before the usual neocon cheerleaders used the title of the US invasion preparation exercise to support their notion that Iran is run by a group of nutty religious fanatics.



Pentagon, ground breaking ceremony: 9/11/41

If you feel this is the case, perhaps you have a thing or two to learn about your own government. Not only is everything in Washington, including the pentagon bathed in occult references and symbolism - Hell, the pentagon is the center of the pentagram - but their military exercises and real world military operations are all executed according to occultism.

The Pentagon (the base)'s "Operation Iron Hammer", which was executed on November 30th (11/30), 2005 occured on the inverse date of the Madrid Train bombings of March 11th (3/11), 2004. If the similarities ended there, it would be absurd to have mentioned this. However in the Madrid Train bombings on 3/11 - a crime allegedly perpetrated by Al Qaida (the base), people who the home phone numbers of Spanish Security Services officials in their cars - 13 bombs were used in the attack. In the 11/30 military operation by the pentagon, the 13th expeditionary unit was used.

Then if you look up "Operation Iron Hammer", you'll see that the US Government wasn't the first government to host this operation. Adolf Hitler hosted this operation during world war 2 and for those that don't know, Hitler was deep into the occult just like our own government documentedly is. Hitler was a member of the Tooley and Thule Societies and many of his staff were part of the Saturnelian Brotherhood.



MOAB (Massive Ordnance Air Ballistic)

The "Shock and Awe" bombing campaign could very well be a reference to Shakina, a female deity referenced in the Talmud. This wouldn't be surprising since several of the Pentagon's highest officials are dual US/Israeli citizens. This notion is only further supported by the fact that they named a new weapon they used exclusively in Operation Iraqi Freedom, which was at first billed as "Operation Iraqi LIberation" (OIL), the M.O.A.B. or "Massive Ordnance Air Blast" seen below.

Why is this significant? Because Saddam Hussein allegedly believes he is the reincarnation of Nimrod and the only tribe that Nimrod could not slay was, you guessed it, the tribe of Moab.

The Iraq war actually commenced on the Vernal Equinox (March 20th), a spring fertility rite for Druids. Then the Bushmaster got up on the aircraft carrier and declared victory, the end to major military operations on May 1st, Beltane, a Satanic holiday. Blood sacrifice is required on both days.



But nevermind all this. Nevermind the bizarre references to "the light" in many of his, Pope Benedictine and Bill Clinton's speeches (Lucifer was the light bearer). Nevermind the references to the New World Order by these same people as well as by several US government, military and CFR publications.

I promise you that your government is engineering a series provocations that will usher in a 3rd World War but again, what do I know? You may now go back to sleep.



Church of Satan



CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) logo



President George W. Bush



General Tommy Franks

The State Quarters program began in 1999. Stars were placed on only some of the coins to signify the order in which the given state was accepted into the union. The state quarters were not issued in the order they were accepted into the union. By the time 9/11 rolled around, only 14 of the state quarters had been released and only 3 of them had stars on them.

New Hampshire (9 stars), New York (11 stars), South Carolina (01 star) = 9/11/01





There are a number of reasons why your government or those who stand to gain from staged acts of terrorism or other psychological operations, would publicly admit to it in a subliminal or cryptic format.

(1) One reason, would be so that your enemies know you're preparing to engage them. Then in preparing for your invasion, they will elicit behavior that is interpreted as offensive.

For example. After Bush declared Iran, Iraq and North Korea the "axis of evil" and invaded Iraq under false pretenses, it was leaked to CNN that Hussein was in fact cooperating with exile negotiations. This was likely a message to the enemy. We're coming for you one way or another. You might as well play your role. How are the rest of the "axis" nations supposed to react to this?

Are they supposed to tell the world that Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor and founder of the Trilateral Commission Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote in his 1997 book "The Grand Chessboard" that America needed a "helpful Pearl Harbor event" in order to have the pretext to seize control of oil output in Central Asia and the Middle East?

Are they supposed to tell the world that 5 of members of PNAC (Project for the New American Century) drafted a document in September of 2000 titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses" in which they wrote about America's need to seize control of mid-East oil through "multiple, simultaneous theater wars" but that we would need to sustain a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" before we would have the license and consequent "agressive increases in military spending" to do so? Those 5 members were Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush and William Krystol. 3 of these men were then appointed to Bush's cabinet months before 9/11 occured.

Are the "axis nations supposed to tell the world that after these subtle references to a Pearl Harbor Event, the Washington Post reported Bush as having written in his journal before bed on 9/11/01, "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today. We think it's Osama bin Laden. We think there are other targets in the United States, but I have urged the country to go back to normal. We cannot allow a terrorist thug to hold us hostage. My hope is that this will provide an opportunity for us to rally the world against terrorism"?

Certainly not. The world would have called them crazy, even though they knew these were cryptic messages. After all, Pearl Harbor was in fact allowed to happend by the US Government, not quite as much engineered to take place as 9/11 but it allowed us a similar result, to engage foreign enemies. Though I would argue that it was more in the vain of Hitler burning his Reichstag and blaming it on foreign enemies since now we are truly the empire invading nations preemptively, nations which had nothing to do with 9/11 and doing so to advance a global agenda.

Here are some articles below that address how the US Government knew full well that the Japanese were going to attack Pearl Harbor and committed treason by allowing it to happen..

"...everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States..." ARMY BOARD, 1944

Flagrant absence of advance intelligence? On the contrary. Numerous reports and warning signs all pointed toward the coming debacle, and the sheer mass of transcribed radio intercepts bordered on overwhelming. (sounds familiar. Can anyone say 9/11?)

Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor?

Pearl Harbor: It might have been avoided: When pieced together and with the benefit of hindsight, we now see that there were many intelligence fragments that pointed to Japanese plans to attack Pearl Harbor.

The McCollum Memo: The Smoking Gun of Pearl Harbor

US prisoners claim Roosevelt left them in Philippines deliberately: HUNDREDS of former US prisoners of war have begun a battle for compensation after uncovering documents that allegedly prove the wartime administration deliberately used them as a tool to whip up domestic support for war with Japan.

(2) A second reason they would use such cryptic messages, would be because at a conscious level, it leaves room for those who don't want to believe it to deny it while people like myself will cite it as evidence and thus be called crazy.

(3) A 3rd reason would be the revalation of the method technique.



The stars on the American flag are right-side up (1 point at the top, 1 on each side, two at the bottom)



So are the stars on the democratic party logo..



Why are the stars on the republican party logo upside down? (2 stars at the top, one on each side, one at the bottom)



..and the same goes for John Kerry's presidential campaign advertisement

OKC Terror foretold months prior in book written by brother of OKC Governor

9/11 foretold on FOX months prior

Hurricane Katrina foretold months prior on ABC

7/7 London Bombings foretold beforehand in "V is for Vendetta" (movie pushed back because of bombings)

Donald Rumsfeld says a plane with a missile hit the pentagon. Is this a verbal gaffe or a Freudian slip?

(Before 8:46 a.m.): Rumsfeld Reportedly Predicts Terror Attacks

Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and Representative Christopher Cox (R) are meeting in Rumsfelds private Pentagon dining room, discussing missile defense. Rumsfeld later recalls, I had said at an eight oclock breakfast that sometime in the next two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve months there would be an event that would occur in the world that would be sufficiently shocking that it would remind people again how important it is to have a strong healthy Defense Department that contributes tothat underpins peace and stability in our world. [Larry King Live, 1/5/2002] Wolfowitz recalls, And we commented to them that based on what Rumsfeld and I had both seen and worked on the Ballistic Missile Threat Commission, that we were probably in for some nasty surprises over the next ten years. [Vanity Fair, 6/9/2005] There are confused accounts that Rumsfeld says, Ive been around the block a few times. There will be another event, just before the Pentagon is hit by Flight 77, but such comments may have been made around this time instead. Rumsfeld says, And someone walked in and handed a note that said that a plane had just hit the World Trade Center. And we adjourned the meeting, and I went in to get my CIA briefing ... right next door here [in my office]. [Larry King Live, 1/5/2002]

(Before 9:37 a.m.): Rumsfeld Said to Make Eerie Predictions, but Witness Who Gives Account Is Long Gone

Representative Christopher Cox later claims he is still meeting with Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. They are still discussing missile defense, apparently completely oblivious of the approaching Flight 77. Watching television coverage from New York City, Rumsfeld says to Cox, Believe me, this isnt over yet. Theres going to be another attack, and it could be us. According to the Daily Telegraph, Flight 77 hits the building moments later. [Daily Telegraph, 1/16/2002] In another telling, Cox claims that Rumsfeld says, If we remain vulnerable to missile attack, a terrorist group or rogue state that demonstrates the capacity to strike the US or its allies from long range could have the power to hold our entire country hostage to nuclear or other blackmail. And let me tell you, Ive been around the block a few times. There will be another event. Rumsfeld repeats that sentence for emphasis. According to Cox, Within minutes of that utterance, Rumsfelds words proved tragically prophetic. Cox also claims, I escaped just minutes before the building was hit. [Office of Representative Christopher Cox, 10/11/2001] However, Rumsfeld claims that this meeting with Cox ended before the second WTC crash, which occurred at 9:03 a.m. Cox himself said that after being told of the WTC, [Rumsfeld] sped off, as did I. Cox says he immediately headed to his car, making it impossible for him to still be in the Pentagon just minutes before it is hit. [Associated Press, 10/11/2001] Another account puts Rumsfelds Ive been around the block a few times. There will be another event comment two minutes before the first WTC crash at 8:46 a.m., when Rumsfeld reportedly makes other predictive comments. [Associated Press, 10/16/2001]

(Before 8:50 a.m.): CIA Director Expresses Worry About al-Qaeda Attack

According to one report, CIA Director Tenet is eating breakfast with his mentor, former Senator David Boren (D). Before the planes hit the World Trade Center, CIA Director George Tenet warned [Boren] ... that he was worried about a possible attack by Osama bin Ladens al-Qaeda network. [Chicago Sun-Times, 1/6/2003]

(8:50 a.m.): CIA Director, Told of Attack, Immediately Suspects bin Laden CIA

Director Tenet is told of the first WTC crash while he is eating breakfast with his mentor, former Senator David Boren (D). They are interrupted when CIA bodyguards converge on the table to hand Tenet the cell phone. Tenet is told that the WTC has been attacked by an airplane. Boren later says, I was struck by the fact that [the messenger] used the word attacked. Tenet then hands a cell phone back to an aide and says to Boren, You know, this has bin Ladens fingerprints all over it. He was very collected, Boren recalls. He said he would be at the CIA in 15 minutes, what people he needed in the room and what he needed to talk about. [ABC News, 10/14/2002; USA Today, 10/24/2001] According to other accounts, Tenet responds to the caller, They steered the plane directly into the building? Tenet then says to Boren, That looks like bin Laden. Tenet muses aloud, I wonder if this has something to do with the guy [Zacarias Moussaoui] who trained for a pilots license. (Moussaoui had been arrested several weeks earlier.) [St. Paul Pioneer Press, 6/29/2002; Stern, 9/13/2003] According to another account, Tenet pauses while on the phone to tell Boren, The World Trade Center has been hit. Were pretty sure it wasnt an accident. It looks like a terrorist act, then returns to the phone to identify who should be summoned to the CIA situation room. [Time, 10/14/2001] (Note that according to two accounts, Tenet was not informed of the developing crisis until after the second WTC tower had been struck. [Washington Post, 2/27/2002; Bamford, 2004] However, the majority of reports indicate that Tenet was informed of the crisis right after the first WTC tower was struck.)

The Pentagon is wargaming to invade a non-existent country called Nair.

Gee, why does a non-existent country sound so familiar?

N-A-I-R

ARIN? No. RIAN? No. RAIN? No. IRNA? No.

How about I-R-A-N

Wake up jack-asses. They think they're cute as hell at the pentagon. They admitted to 9/11 in code in about 300 places. Nevermind the plethora of hardcore evidence that they did it.




Do not fear; put your trust in him! The life-giving power of his light is an incentive for building a new world order based on just ethical and economic relationships,
(Notice the reference to the light, Lucifer means bringer of light) --Pope Benedict XVI

"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." --David Spangler, Director of PLANETARY INITIATIVE, (a United Nations World government group. He is of the Findhorn, Scotland New Age Crowd, like Robert Mueller of the United Nations)

"We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." --Arthur Schlesinger Junior in Foreign Affairs (July/ August 1995)



"... what is at stake, is more than one small country. It is a big idea. A New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace, and security, freedom, and the rule of law ... [The war in Iraq is] a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, ... our fifth objective, - a New World Order, can emerge: a new era, freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace ... Now we can see a new world coming into view, a world in which there is a very real prospect of a New World Order. ... We are now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders." --George Herbert Walker Bush President of U.S.: 1989 ~ 1993. CFR Director, Trilateralist, CIA Director, Yale Skull and Bones Society. Speaking before Congress on 11th September, 1991 [Televised]

We are a nation of communities...a brilliant diversity spread like stars, like a thousand points of light in a broad and peaceful sky. (Notice again, like Pope Benedict's recent statement cited above, the reference to "the light". It was reported in the London Times that Tony Blair channels "the light") --George Herbert Walker Bush Acceptance speech, Republican National Convention, 1988, acutally written by Peggy Noonan

Alice A. Bailey uses the phrase "points of light"(like Bush's 1000 points of light, like the 1000 points of light in the ceiling of the cathedral of the "Mothers of Darkess" Castle in Muno, Belgium used for elite sacrifices and holds a book written in blood of all NWO secrets and history) in connection with a "New Group of World Servers" and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of "the organizing of the men and women...group work of a new order...[with] progress defined by service...the world of the Brotherhood...the Forces of Light...[and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the New World Order must be built."

The Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N. summits. Later, Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey's writings on the subject.

--Alice A. Bailey [1880 ~ 1949] (Co-Mason[A female Freemason]) Creator of The Lucifer Trust (now discretely renamed 'The Lucis Trust') and a Leading Disciple of Madam Blavatsky. Bailey is an Occultist, whose works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. The Lucis Trust has a close consultative relationship with the U.N. and the Queen of England to name but two. 'The Externalization of the Hierarchy' (Book: 1934)

Case Closed. The 2 Israeli Soldiers were Kidnapped in Lebanon

THE TWO ISRAELI SOLDIERS
WERE CAPTURED IN LEBANON


The militant group Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers during clashes Wednesday across the border in southern Lebanon, prompting a swift reaction from Israel, which sent ground forces into its neighbor to look for them. The forces were trying to keep the soldiers' captors from moving them deeper into Lebanon, Israeli government officials said on condition of anonymity. [Forbes 7/12/06]

The Lebanese Shiite Hezbollah movement announced on Wednesday that its guerrillas have captured two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon. "Implementing our promise to free Arab prisoners in Israeli jails, our strugglers have captured two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon," a statement by Hezbollah said. "The two soldiers have already been moved to a safe place," it added. The Lebanese police said that the two soldiers were captured as they "infiltrated" into the town of Aitaa al-Chaab inside the Lebanese border. [Hindustan Times 7/12/06]



The Lebanese Hezbollah movement announced Wednesday the arrest of two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon. Lebanese police said that the two soldiers were arrested as they entered the town of Aitaa al-Chaab inside the Lebanese border. Israeli aircraft were active in the air over southern Lebanon, police said, with jets bombing roads leading to the market town of Nabatiyeh, 60 kilometers south of Beirut. [Bahrain News Agency 7/12/06]

TRANSLATION: According to the Lebanese police force, the two soldiers were captured in Lebanese territory, in the area of Aïta Al-Chaab close to the border, whereas Israeli television indicated that they had been captured in Israeli territory. [fr.news.yahoo 7/12/06]



In the afternoon, the scene changed in the streets of southern Lebanon, which was the target of 32 Israeli raids that mainly targeted areas near the area where the two soldiers were captured in Aita al Chaab, close to the border with Israel. [news.monstersandcritics.com 7/12/06]

According to the Lebanese police force, the two Israeli soldiers were captured in Lebanese territory, in the area of Aïta Al-Chaab, near to the border with Israel, where an Israeli unit had penetrated in middle of morning. [AFP 7/12/06]

The militant group Hezbollah said it captured two Israeli soldiers during clashes across the border in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. [chinabroadcast 7/12/06]

It all started on July 12 when Israel troops were ambushed on Lebanon's side of the border with Israel. Hezbollah, which commands the Lebanese south, immediately seized on their crossing. They arrested two Israeli soldiers, killed eight Israelis and wounded over 20 in attacks inside Israeli territory. [Asia Times 7/15/06]

TRANSLATION: Hezbollah has made it clear time and again that it would retaliate by capturing and detaining Israeli soldiers if they entered Lebanon and use them in an exchange of prisoners. Israel has in a deliberate manner sent a commando into Lebanon (Aïta Al Chaab) They came under attack from Hezbollah, who captured two of their soldiers. [voltairenet.org 7/18/06]

Only weeks ago, an entire reserve division was drafted in order to train for an operation such as the one the IDF is planning in response to Wednesday morning's Hizbullah attacks on IDF forces along the northern border. [JPost 7/12/06]

Israel's military response by air, land and sea to what it considered a provocation last week by Hezbollah militants is unfolding according to a plan finalized more than a year ago.

In the years since Israel ended its military occupation of southern Lebanon, it watched warily as Hezbollah built up its military presence in the region. When Hezbollah militants kidnapped two Israeli soldiers last week, the Israeli military was ready to react almost instantly. [SFGate 7/21/06]

Do you get it yet?

Israel sent troops across the border into Lebanon. They then claimed the captured invaders were "kidnap victims" and launched their attacks.


Israel's "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" (?!?) was written by many of the same chicken-hawks who wrote the notorious PNAC documents before 9/11, outlining "pre-emptive invasions" and "multiple simultaneous theater wars" to "secure US (corporate) interests" in the Middle-East which they acknowledged would only be possible provided the US sustain a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor", an event Bush referred to as such in his diary that fateful night according to the Washington Post but nevermind their sick mantras.

It is already clear to anyone with even a minimal amount of reading comprehension, deductive reasoning, logic, objectivity and stomach, that 9/11 was organized by a mafia-like network encompassing in the very least small criminal elements of the FBI, Pentagon, private US interests, Mossad and the ISI as the Church and McCormack-Dickstein committees demonstrated for us definitively that the military industrial complex knows no bureauratic or moral boundaries but what is the end goal?

Some will acknowledge that terrorist events as well as war provocations are being contrived by these interests but that it's ultimately in the interest of the human community, that it's to bring about "world peace" through world government.

Unfortunately, those people are only a small step ahead of the Down's patients - and I hate to insult Down's patients - who believe that not only were elements of the US government not complicit in engineering the attacks of 9/11 but that they were just plain incompetent, that all of the bureaucratic rewards they've gotten for their perceived inadeuquacy as history had previously demonstrated over and over again would be the case, served as no motive whatsoever.

You just keep laughing at their inadequacy and crying on the way to the gas pump while they laugh all the way to the bank and burst into tears, guffawing at your ceaseless naivety, planning the worldwide hollocaust that will engulf the great majority of you.

Like I said, Israel is Intentionally Targeting Civilians in Lebanon

Now let me be clear about what I'm saying..

I'm not suggesting that the those pulling the triggers, those dropping the bombs, are intentionally killing civilians.

I believe, like I have since day 1, that those feeding them intelligence are either intentionally giving them false intelligence or are using guidelines for intelligence gathering or the rules of engagement which were conceived with the intention of causing high civilian casualty rates.

Now why would Israeli leadership do such a thing?

Perhaps the aim is to intentionally radicalize Lebanon's civilian population, causing them to embrace Hizbollah and legitamize protracted occupation just as the sectarian violence in Iraq, much of which has allegedly been seeded by covert-op units blowing up Sunni and Shiite Mosques has done.

This sounds absurd to those who operate under the baseless assumption that wars are about striking hard, securing the peace and going home, turning your back on billions of dollars in weapons, oil and infrastructure contracts and limiting the chaotic fallout in surrounding areas, especially neighboring nations who rightly feel they are future targets, arming themselves to the teeth and making other preparatory defense measures while you're stuck in a so-called quagmire, measures which you can allege to your own public are offensive measures allowing you to sell them on another war at a future juntion, perhaps after a draft or black-op terrorist attack on allied nation(s) who will consequently support your plight.

Let's hear it. Let's hear any of the wilfully ignorant apologists who believe otherwise, that these actions, like virtually all of the so-called "bumbling" in Iraq, is about incompetence and not strategic destablization. I want to hear why it is in the best interest of people who are following the blueprints - PNAC and the Clean Break Strategy - of neocon "crazies" as they had been referred to by former White House cabinet officials BEFORE 9/11 and their fascist counterparts, the Likudites in Israel, to make peace and not pieces of the entire arab world, as many of their documents suggest is the goal, balkanization of each nation into 3-5 sections each, embedded with western business interests, precisely what is being sold right now.

Imperial nations, nations which have a military advantage throughout history, have always expanded their influence through covert or overt coups and especially false-flag attacks on themselves. In the latter part of the 20th and now 21st centuries, those nations have been primarily the US, the UK and Israel. Such nations have an incentive to do so because they have the capability to get it done, unlike smaller power blocks, which do not have the advantage, yet those in the crosshairs will always seek to expand their power as a check and balance against the imperial powers seeking their demise. Such power blocks have always been demonized by the imperial nations as the ones seeking world domination, not merely survival.

Small power blocks will not attack themselves to give them the perceived license to consequently attack larger power blocks. That would be absurd. They have no incentive to engage such nations and be destroyed. They especially don't have an incentive to provocateur larger power blocks into engaging them first, such as we are told hizbollah has done to Israel. It's already a foregone conclusion when you look at all of the evidence, that Israeli war interests contrived the border skirmish with Hizbollah, just as Bush and Blair discussed painting US planes and UN planes, goading Hussein into shooting them down before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, so they could have their war.

For what purpose do you think the US and Israel have laid out their broad imperial goals for all of the public to see, in documents on their own websites? If you can come up with a better way to convince your enemies to build caches of weapons and prepare for war, consequently giving yourself an opportunity to tell your public "look, they're getting ready to attack you", I would like to hear it. In fact, this phenomenon is documented. The US did this in world war 2 with the McCollum Memos.

So long as they can keep pouring on the rhetoric about Iran and Syria, while engaging in protracted occupations with their neighbors, it serves their ultimate agenda, guaranteed conflict with Iran.

Questions for Those Who Still Support the Direction of the War on Terror

Questions for asslicking Bush supporters..

(1) How do you feel about the fact that they planned on painting warplanes as UN planes to provoke Hussein into attacking?

(2) How do you feel about the fact that while Bush and other administration officials were saying that Hussein could deliver a nuclear strike on the Western world in as little as 45 minutes notice, that Hussein was negotiating exile?

(3) How do you feel about the fact that the coalition doubled the RAF bombing raids before the war while they were allegedly seeking diplomacy?

(4) How do you feel about the fact that Zarqawi's role in Iraq was largely if not entirely fabricated by occupational interests?

(5) How do you feel about how the vulturous heads of several nations, frothing at the mouth for war with Iran, have skewed Iranian president Ahmadinejad's statements and gone so far as to write entirely fraudulent stories about him altogether 1, 2) through their obedient goose-steppers in the press?

I'm no liberal, in fact I'm a real conservative libertarian but make no mistake.. I have a sense of justice and if our nation acts militarily against Iran, we deserve to go down. That's just the plain truth.

If you step foot on Iranian soil, you deserve to have your melon blown clean off.

All of the Trotskeyite neotrash can cry all day long about how this is the product of some anti-war liberalism but you and your heros have zero (0) credibility in the first place. Anybody who has any relationship with reality will continue to laugh at you.

Saturday, April 15, 2006

How the Anglo-American Establishment Spent Decades Corraling the World into Armageddon

This is really a 2 part series. First I'll address how the establishment is selling you their carefully engineered 3rd World War and then I'll trace back just how we got to where we are today. Put on your seatbelts.



www.newworldslaughter.blogspot.com | April 15 2006

You know what's funny, scary and not surprising all at the same time? The fact that recent AP (Associated Propaganda) articles are completely skewed to support the US Government's agenda to invade Iran though it's not surprising when you understand the history of the American press, or any so-called free press for that matter.

They're so chock full of distortion and misleading allusions that I don't know where to begin.

First of all, it must be said that most of the Pentagon's top brass are dual US/Israeli citizens, so when Iranian president Ahmadinejad attacks "the Zionist regime" as he calls it, it's not like he's attacking the poor, innocent people of Israel so much as he is attacking the incredibly powerful and documented Israeli government influence of the US war machine.

I don't have software capable of translating Arabic but I really don't even need it to demonstrate how misleading this AP article is. I will address each conveniently vague or misleading statement in bold text followed by my analysis.

"The president of Iran again lashed out at Israel on Friday and said it was "heading toward annihilation," just days after Tehran raised fears about its nuclear activities by saying it successfully enriched uranium for the first time."

Now if Iranian president Ahmadinejad said that the land of Israel itself was "heading toward annihilation", why didn't the AP writer quote his entire statement or at least for Christ's sake, his entire sentence? Instead, the writer uses the word Israel himself and then quotes a small fragment of his statement. For all we know, he could have been referring to Iraq. Most likely, he was referring to "the Zionist regime" which he later addresses in such terms. Even so, is this a threat? Not necessarily.

It's safe to say that in whatever public forum Iranian president Ahaminejad was addressing Israel or their government, he did so in Arabic. Now, has anyone ever heard of a thesaurus? In a thesaurus, if you look up a word such as "destroy", it might show you a dozen words which mean essentially the same thing, perhaps with slight variation. Now, translating from one language to another is not so much an exact science as it is an art. You often have a broad range of lattitude to work with.

In some languages for instance, there may be a word which means "to destroy by corruption" which is essentially how all things are destroyed; either by one's own corruption or corruption of the entity by foreign elements, eg. compromised (corrupted) by an enemy airstrike.

Such exclusivity in a word allows for translation into another language using a word that does not depict the idea in such exclusive terms. For instance, Christians worship a monotheistic God. However the word God is translated from the Hebrew word "Elohim", the Cannan constituency of which is polytheistic or meaning a congregation of Gods (plural).

In the following Webster's Dictionary definition of the word "annihilate", the 2nd description as seen below is "to regard as of no consequnce".

ANNIHILATE:

1 a : to cause to be of no effect : NULLIFY b : to destroy the substance or force of
2 : to regard as of no consequence
3 : to cause to cease to exist; especially : KILL
4 a : to destroy a considerable part of b : to vanquish completely : ROUT
intransitive senses, of a particle and its antiparticle : to vanish or cease to exist by coming together and changing into other forms of energy (as radiation or particles)

"To regard of no consequence" means to become irrelevant. There are a number of ways to become irrelevant, the least of which is your own corruption. Could this have been what the Iranian president meant? Is the motive behind why the AP writer mentions Iran's nuclear enrichment in the same sentence he mentions Ahmadinejad's address of Israel or Zionist (Israeli government) influence at the Pentagon as being on the verge of "annihilation" (irrelevant?) not becoming clearer? Let's continue to analyze the AP article and test the hypotheses.

"President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called Israel a "permanent threat" to the Middle East that will "soon" be liberated. He also appeared to again question whether the Holocaust really happened."

Now again, why did the AP writer leave the word Israel out of Ahmadinejad's statement, yet quote the fragment of his speech where he says the words "permanent threat"? The writer also puts emphasis on the word "soon" by giving it quotations all it's own. Why the emphasis on "soon"? Oh, I get it. We're supposed to be concerned that (1), the annihilation of Israel following (2), Iran's claims of nuclear enrichment is to come (3), soon.

"Like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation," Ahmadinejad said at the opening of a conference in support of the Palestinians. "The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm."

Notice that the AP writer takes Ahmadinejad's statement in it's entire context this time, using it to reinforce their previous skewed characterization of a translation which is already likely misleading.

The president of Iran refers to the Zionist regime as a "rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm." Now here, he is very likely describing the fall of Israel should they be attacked militarily though he never threatens to initiate such a war.

I am not one to doubt that Iran has intentions of building nuclear weapons. There are a number of reasons why they have no other choice if their government wants to maintain control of it's own country and possibly expand their influence, which is the aim of all nations, either militarily (imperialism) or otherwise (alliances). Their capacity to strike down governments of other nations would serve as a deterrent for their imperial enemies, enemies who have drawn up their imperial intentions in their own documents which I will address in conclusion of this article.

To believe that Iran would engage in an offensive military action without provocation is to believe that they want to commit suicide given the geostrategic and logistical nuclear capacity of the US, Britain and Israel to render Iran nothing more than a memory. This is a popular belief, since suicide bombings are in fact part of Muslim extremist culture. However through massive and unrelenting propaganda, most Americans and the world really, do not see the difference between impoverished Palestinians with nothing to lose and a burgeoning Islamic Empire with everything to lose.

Terrorist attacks on civilians and preemptive warfare are both incredibly ill-advised moves for a burgeoning, yet relatively small and vulnerable government. You need to remember this if missles rain down on civilian targets in either America or Israel, regardless of who the international community (New World Order) claims struck first. Such strikes would do nothing to neutralize their threat (US, Britain, Israel) and actually increase support for war against Iran, possibly even a draft unless large international support renders it unnecessary. However if the entire Arab world erupts in warfare, which some have suggested is possible and I agree with, other parties (China, Russia) may see an opportunity to get involved and in that case, all bets are off.

The Pearl Harbor Attack was not a surprise attack to the US federal government nor was the notion that US citizens would be seized upon the US military's departure from the Phillipines. Both events were forseen and the defense to these threats were both thwarted or directly aided so that the American people would support entering World War 2. I will outline all of this in Exhibit (1) at the bottom of this page.

Now why does Iran have no choice other than to enrich uranium and build nuclear weapons if it wants to survive as a nation state?

I will very briefly outline why they have been given no choice and why we are certainly headed for world war engineered by the dominant powers of the world, claiming to be interested in diplomacy. To fully understand this, a brief history of US exploits in the Middle East must be addressed.

Timeline of Events

In 1953 and still unbeknowest to most Americans and the world, the CIA staged a coup on Iranian president Mohammed Mossadegh who ran a socially progressive, secular Muslim government that was ahead of it's time, even allowing women to vote in political elections. It's important to note that this coup was preceded by Mossadegh's resistance to bullying by British Petroleum.

The CIA was funding Mossadegh's replacement, the young Shah Reza Pahlavi, to assume power following the removal of Mossadegh. The Shah was a mere shadow of his father who had previously supported a pro-nazi regime in world war 2. It was reported by Amnesty International in 1976 that SAVAK, the Shah's CIA trained security force, had the worst human rights record on the planet and that the number and variety of torture techniques the CIA had tought SAVAK were "beyond belief".

Then of course there was the Iranian revolution in 1979. It's not impossible that external forces such as the CIA were secretly supporting the Iranian influences that precipiated the revolution or God forbid, influences in Iran which are now engaging in just the kind of theater that will inevitably lead to their invasion. This is just the thing that PNAC (Project for a New American Century) admits they want in their own documents. You would be foolish not to at least examine this information before discarding it as conspiracy nonsense. It would do alot to explain Iran Contra and the October Surprise.

In 1963, the CIA allegedly funded a Baathist Party coup on Iraq, which would not be surprsing considering their cozy relationship which flourished for over 20 bloody years.

In 1970, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) changed their fatigue colors from dark greens to light browns, which were better for camoflauge in desert environments.

In 1991, Saddam Hussein sought US consultancy on Iraq's border dispute with Kuwait. US Ambassador to Iraq April Gillespie was told to emphasize the instruction by James Baker that they had "no opinion" on Iraq's border dispute with Kuwait. Why would Hussein have invaded Kuwait had he known a massive US led coalition would be poised to head him off at the pass? Was Hussein given false assurance to invade thinking that the US wasn't interested in getting involved? It certainly appears that way. The geostrategic motives for having done so are far ranging but to address them here would divert too far from the subject at hand.

Even most Americans are now aware of some of the basis for the arguement that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, that is to say carried out at least in part by Western imperial and financial interests. What most are not aware of, is that Israeli newspapers and even some American papers covered the fact that alleged Israeli spies were caught in New York on 9/11 videotaping the disaster and laughing. They were working for a non-existent moving company called "Urban Moving Systems" as federal officials later found out and were in possession of thousands of dollars in cash and box cutters. Their van reportedly smelled like explosives and their operation was traced to an empty warehouse in New Jersey but they were detained for a matter of weeks and let go after which they fled back to Israel, having been in the US illegally.

This is really only the tip of the iceberg concerning the Israeli connection to 9/11. I cover the minority of evidence on my google blog here but I plan on addressing the full spectrum of available information soon. Even Fox News Network covered this, as well as other spy rings which operated in close vicinity to the alleged 9/11 hijackers and other events which call into question the true motives behind Israeli black-ops, whose mysterious activity is only shared and compounded by those of the US and certain Middle Eastern alliances they were working with before 9/11.

Despite the presence of evidence that the US as well as their Israeli, Pakistani and Saudi friends were involved in 9/11, though not in the manner the general public is led to believe by the largely skewed media coverage of the events, the Bush administration referred to Iraq, Iran and North Korea as the "axis of evil" following 9/11 and even has gone so far as to imply that Iraq and Iran associate with the parties involved.

During the marketing campaign that preceded the Iraq war while Bush administration officials were telling the world that Saddam Hussein had the capacity to strike the Western world with nuclear weapons in as little as 45 minutes notice, Hussein was negotiating exile as we now know. It appears as though Hussein was not only not the threat our government claimed to believe he was but that he was seeking diplomacy.

This was while the US and RAF doubled their bombing rate on Iraq in 2002 which had been a program that commenced during the first Gulf War. The New York Times also reported that at meetings between the US and UK held before the 2003 invasion, they discussed painting US planes to appear as UN planes, trying to goad Iraq into shooting them down.

In the Project for a New American Century's own documents on their website which Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush and Paul Wolfowitz were members of years before 3 of which found themselves appointees in the Bush administration, they discussed the need for "agressive increases in military spending" which would serve their proposition to stage "multiple and simultaneous theater wars" but that such an agenda would not be possible and I quote, "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor." [neon sign flashing - 9/11]

Conclusion

So what is Iran to do? Are they to wait for another 9/11 type false-flag attack, after which blood would again be boiling and again the world would stand down as governments seize upon an invasion of Iran, perhaps even framing them in the attack? Are they to wait for a black-op coup on their government such as they got in 1953, such as Iraq got in 1963? Are they to try diplomatic efforts such as Hussein did in 2002? Are they to wait until the US literally shoves them around?

Iran has learned from Iraq's mistakes and though their resistance may lead to a bloodier outcome for all of us than Iraq did and continues to, they stand a fighting chance of deterring the US war machine from invading them. Perhaps in the unlikely event that the neocon/zionist/redcoat alliance doesn't engineer a climate through propaganda or false-flag events that makes an invasion of Iran a reality, Iran may someday become the threat to the world and their own nation that the Western world is now. In that event, I would support a fierce resistance against them. Until that day comes, I cannot in good conscience do so.

Exhibit (1)

"...everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States..." ARMY BOARD, 1944

Flagrant absence of advance intelligence? On the contrary. Numerous reports and warning signs all pointed toward the coming debacle, and the sheer mass of transcribed radio intercepts bordered on overwhelming. (sounds familiar. Can anyone say 9/11?)

Interview

Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor?


Pearl Harbor: It might have been avoided: When pieced together and with the benefit of hindsight, we now see that there were many intelligence fragments that pointed to Japanese plans to attack Pearl Harbor.

The McCollum Memo: The Smoking Gun of Pearl Harbor

US prisoners claim Roosevelt left them in Philippines deliberately: HUNDREDS of former US prisoners of war have begun a battle for compensation after uncovering documents that allegedly prove the wartime administration deliberately used them as a tool to whip up domestic support for war with Japan.

A Parting Look Back:
Was the 3rd World War forseen much further back than we realize?




"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the 'agentur' (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.

The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.

We shall unleash the Nihilists and the Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute Atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

--General Albert Pike [1809 ~ 1891] 33rd degree, Sovereign Grand Master of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Free Masonry, Co-Founder of the Ku Klux Klan and Supreme Luciferian Pontiff. .. in a letter to Mazzini, 15th August, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place. It is a commonly believed fallacy that for a short time, the Pike letter to Mazzini was on display in the British Museum Library in London, and it was copied by William Guy Carr, former Intelligence Officer in the Royal Canadian Navy. The British Library has confirmed in writing to me (Michael Haupt) that such a document has never been in their possession. Furthermore, in Carr's book, Satan, Prince of this World, Carr includes the following footnote:

"The Keeper of Manuscripts recently informed the author that this letter is NOT catalogued in the British Museum Library. It seems strange that a man of Cardinal Rodriguez's knowledge should have said that it WAS in 1925".

It appears that Carr learned about this letter from Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez of Santiago, Chile, who wrote The Mystery of Freemasonry Unveiled.

To date, no conclusive proof exists to show that this letter was ever written. Nevertheless, the letter is widely quoted and the topic of much discussion.